1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt. (54 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt. (100 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2009 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | 240 | Colt |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 54 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 47 L |