1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2010 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2010 Nissan Frontier is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,952 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Frontier (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 796 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Frontier (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2010 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | 240 | Frontier |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 3952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 2316 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |