1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 96 kg more than 2010 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | 240 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1424 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |