1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro (312 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 292 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2011 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Jaguar | Chevrolet |
Model | 240 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 312 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 376 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1812 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 72 L |