1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2012 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2012 Jeep Compass is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2012 Jeep Compass. (172 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2012 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 71 kg more than 2012 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jeep Compass. (223 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2012 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | 240 | Compass |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1449 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1814 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 51 L |