1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 293 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Jaguar | Dodge |
Model | 240 | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1813 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 72 L |