1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 680 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | 240 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 93 L |