1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1041 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Jaguar 240 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
| Model | 240 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 544 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 2561 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 100 L |
