1967 Jaguar Type S vs. 1996 Volkswagen Caravelle

To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Caravelle is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar Type S (208 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1996 Volkswagen Caravelle. (109 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar Type S should accelerate faster than 1996 Volkswagen Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volkswagen Caravelle weights approximately 20 kg more than 1967 Jaguar Type S.

Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar Type S (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volkswagen Caravelle. (190 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar Type S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volkswagen Caravelle.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Jaguar Type S 1996 Volkswagen Caravelle
Make Jaguar Volkswagen
Model Type S Caravelle
Year Released 1967 1996
Engine Size 3442 cc 2461 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 109 HP
Engine RPM 5550 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 190 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1640 kg


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]