1967 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1983 Renault 18
To start off, 1983 Renault 18 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Renault 18 (63 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1967 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Renault 18 should accelerate faster than 1967 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1983 Renault 18.
Because 1967 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Renault 18. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault 18. (103 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jeep CJ5 | 1983 Renault 18 | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | CJ5 | 18 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2450 mm |