1967 Jensen FF vs. 1952 Triumph TR2
To start off, 1967 Jensen FF is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Jensen FF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jensen FF (279 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1952 Triumph TR2. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jensen FF should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph TR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jensen FF weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1952 Triumph TR2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jensen FF (587 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph TR2. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Jensen FF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph TR2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Jensen FF | 1952 Triumph TR2 | |
| Make | Jensen | Triumph |
| Model | FF | TR2 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6276 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 279 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 587 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 108 mm | 83.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2250 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 56 L |
