1967 Lamborghini Marzal vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Lamborghini Marzal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Lamborghini Marzal would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (199 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1967 Lamborghini Marzal. (175 HP @ 6800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1967 Lamborghini Marzal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 293 kg more than 1967 Lamborghini Marzal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (258 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Lamborghini Marzal. (179 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Lamborghini Marzal. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1967 Lamborghini Marzal has manual transmission. 1967 Lamborghini Marzal will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Lamborghini Marzal | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Lamborghini | Cadillac |
| Model | Marzal | ATS |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 199 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 101 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 11.4 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1503 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1418 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 61 L |
