1967 Lancia Fulvia vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 1978 Mazda 616 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Lancia Fulvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Lancia Fulvia would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Lancia Fulvia (87 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Lancia Fulvia should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Lancia Fulvia weights approximately 13 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda 616 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Lancia Fulvia. (114 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda 616 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Lancia Fulvia.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Lancia Fulvia | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Fulvia | 616 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1978 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 114 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.7 mm | 83 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2480 mm |