1967 Lotus Seven vs. 2004 Opel Omega
To start off, 2004 Opel Omega is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Opel Omega (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1967 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1967 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Opel Omega weights approximately 1303 kg more than 1967 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Lotus Seven | 2004 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Lotus | Opel |
| Model | Seven | Omega |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1733 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 75 L |
