1967 Marcos 1600 vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1967 Marcos 1600 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Marcos 1600 (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Marcos 1600 should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 900 kg more than 1967 Marcos 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Marcos 1600 | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Marcos | Talbot |
Model | 1600 | Baby |
Year Released | 1967 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 1652 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 3130 mm |