1967 Marcos 1600 vs. 1985 Mazda 323
To start off, 1985 Mazda 323 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Marcos 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Marcos 1600 would be higher. At 1,652 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Marcos 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Marcos 1600 (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1985 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Marcos 1600 should accelerate faster than 1985 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mazda 323 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1967 Marcos 1600.
Because 1967 Marcos 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Marcos 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Marcos 1600 (172 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mazda 323. (101 Nm). This means 1967 Marcos 1600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Marcos 1600 | 1985 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Marcos | Mazda |
Model | 1600 | 323 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1652 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 101 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 870 kg |