1967 Marcos 1600 vs. 1990 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1990 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Marcos 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Marcos 1600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Marcos 1600 (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Marcos 1600 should accelerate faster than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 425 kg more than 1967 Marcos 1600.
Because 1967 Marcos 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Marcos 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Marcos 1600 | 1990 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Marcos | Plymouth |
Model | 1600 | Sundance |
Year Released | 1967 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1652 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2470 mm |