1967 Marcos 1600 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Marcos 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Marcos 1600 would be higher. At 1,900 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Marcos 1600 (120 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Marcos 1600 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Because 1967 Marcos 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Marcos 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (280 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Marcos 1600. (172 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Marcos 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Marcos 1600 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Marcos | Renault |
Model | 1600 | Megane |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1652 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 280 Nm |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2680 mm |