1967 Marcos 1600 vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Marcos 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Marcos 1600 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 224 more horse power than 1967 Marcos 1600. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1967 Marcos 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Marcos 1600. (172 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Marcos 1600. 2011 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1967 Marcos 1600 has manual transmission. 1967 Marcos 1600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Marcos 1600 | 2011 Holden Calais | |
Make | Marcos | Holden |
Model | 1600 | Calais |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1652 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 172 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |