1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1962 Simca 1000
To start off, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1962 Simca 1000. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1962 Simca 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 208 kg more than 1962 Simca 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Simca 1000. (73 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 1962 Simca 1000 | |
Make | Mazda | Simca |
Model | Cosmo | 1000 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1962 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 944 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 73 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 732 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 36 L |