1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 40 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | Cosmo | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1189 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2290 mm |
