1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Omega is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Omega weights approximately 190 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Oldsmobile Omega (183 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1981 Oldsmobile Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 1981 Oldsmobile Omega | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cosmo | Omega |
Year Released | 1967 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2474 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2670 mm |