1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 20 kg more than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 1984 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cosmo | Colt |
Year Released | 1967 | 1984 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1437 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2390 mm |