1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1984 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 1984 Toyota Corolla is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1984 Toyota Corolla. (74 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1984 Toyota Corolla. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 40 kg more than 1984 Toyota Corolla. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Toyota Corolla. (103 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 1984 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Cosmo | Corolla |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1295 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 103 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 75 L |
