1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1995 Proton Saloon
To start off, 1995 Proton Saloon is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1995 Proton Saloon. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1995 Proton Saloon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Proton Saloon weights approximately 10 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Proton Saloon. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Proton Saloon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 1995 Proton Saloon | |
| Make | Mazda | Proton |
| Model | Cosmo | Saloon |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1299 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2390 mm |
