1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1996 Peugeot 306
To start off, 1996 Peugeot 306 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Peugeot 306 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Peugeot 306 (167 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Peugeot 306 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Peugeot 306 weights approximately 274 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Peugeot 306 (197 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Peugeot 306 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 1996 Peugeot 306 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | Cosmo | 306 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1997 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1214 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |