1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1998 Samsung SM5
To start off, 1998 Samsung SM5 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Samsung SM5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Samsung SM5 (133 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Samsung SM5 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Samsung SM5 weights approximately 505 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Samsung SM5 (184 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Samsung SM5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 1998 Samsung SM5 | |
Make | Mazda | Samsung |
Model | Cosmo | SM5 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2710 mm |