1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2000 Volvo S40
To start off, 2000 Volvo S40 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S40 (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S40 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S40 (300 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2000 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Cosmo | S40 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1946 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |
