1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | Cosmo | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3494 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3060 mm |