1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2003 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2003 Skoda Fabia is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Skoda Fabia. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2003 Skoda Fabia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Skoda Fabia weights approximately 190 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Skoda Fabia. (112 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Skoda Fabia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2003 Skoda Fabia | |
| Make | Mazda | Skoda |
| Model | Cosmo | Fabia |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1198 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 45 L |
