1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2004 MG TF
To start off, 2004 MG TF is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG TF (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MG TF weights approximately 250 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 MG TF (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2004 MG TF | |
| Make | Mazda | MG |
| Model | Cosmo | TF |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1796 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 50 L |
