1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2004 Nissan Altima
To start off, 2004 Nissan Altima is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,505 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Altima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Altima (175 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Altima should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Altima weights approximately 421 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Altima (244 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Altima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2004 Nissan Altima | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | Cosmo | Altima |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2505 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1361 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 76 L |
