1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 464 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Cosmo | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2488 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1404 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |