1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2004 Saturn Vue
To start off, 2004 Saturn Vue is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Saturn Vue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saturn Vue (143 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saturn Vue should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saturn Vue weights approximately 515 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saturn Vue (206 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Saturn Vue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2004 Saturn Vue | |
| Make | Mazda | Saturn |
| Model | Cosmo | Vue |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2196 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 143 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1455 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 62 L |
