1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (221 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 377 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Cosmo | ML |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2987 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 2150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 95 L |