1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2005 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Musso is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Musso (148 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 885 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Musso (210 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2005 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | Cosmo | Musso |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2295 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 73 L |