1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1013 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Cosmo | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 4671 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 434 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 87 L |