1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (208 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (340 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Cosmo | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2401 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 2095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 72 L |
