1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2006 Renault Espace
To start off, 2006 Renault Espace is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Espace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Espace (161 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Espace should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Espace weights approximately 820 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Espace (250 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Espace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2006 Renault Espace | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Cosmo | Espace |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 83 L |