1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2006 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2006 Renault Laguna is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Laguna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Laguna (168 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Laguna weights approximately 455 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Laguna (270 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2006 Renault Laguna | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Cosmo | Laguna |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1997 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 70 L |