1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2008 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2008 Nissan Micra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2008 Nissan Micra. (79 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Micra weights approximately 103 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Micra. (110 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2008 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | Cosmo | Micra |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1238 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 46 L |
