1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2008 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2008 Toyota Matrix is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Matrix (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 1641 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Matrix (165 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2008 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Cosmo | Matrix |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1799 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 2581 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 50 L |