1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2009 Tata Sumo
To start off, 2009 Tata Sumo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Tata Sumo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2009 Tata Sumo. (69 HP @ 3000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Sumo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Tata Sumo weights approximately 860 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Tata Sumo (223 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Tata Sumo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2009 Tata Sumo | |
| Make | Mazda | Tata |
| Model | Cosmo | Sumo |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2956 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 69 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 223 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4258 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1726 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1925 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2425 mm |
