1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2012 BMW 335
To start off, 2012 BMW 335 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW 335 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 335 (320 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 335 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 335 weights approximately 875 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 335 (450 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 335 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2012 BMW 335 | |
Make | Mazda | BMW |
Model | Cosmo | 335 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2979 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4624 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1372 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 57 L |