1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 938 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (230 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Cosmo | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2384 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1878 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4673 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2707 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 65 L |
