1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando (174 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 660 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando (232 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Orlando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2012 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | Cosmo | Orlando |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2384 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2760 mm |