1967 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2013 Chevrolet Spark
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2013 Chevrolet Spark. (67 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2013 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Spark weights approximately 89 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Spark. (111 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mazda Cosmo | 2013 Chevrolet Spark | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Cosmo | Spark |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1200 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 111 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1029 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3673 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1597 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1522 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2375 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 35 L |
