1967 Mazda Luce vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Luce. (70 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Luce.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Luce. (118 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Luce.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Luce | 2010 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | Luce | Malibu |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 61 L |