1967 Mazda Luce vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Luce. (70 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Luce. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 168 kg more than 1967 Mazda Luce. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Clio (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Luce. (118 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Luce.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mazda Luce | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Luce | Clio |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |