1967 McLaren M1C vs. 2000 Plymouth Prowler
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Prowler is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 McLaren M1C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 McLaren M1C would be higher. At 5,818 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 McLaren M1C is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Plymouth Prowler has automatic transmission and 1967 McLaren M1C has manual transmission. 1967 McLaren M1C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Plymouth Prowler will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 McLaren M1C | 2000 Plymouth Prowler | |
| Make | McLaren | Plymouth |
| Model | M1C | Prowler |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 5818 cc | 3507 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
